Cover
Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025)

Published: September 19, 2025

Pages: 36-43

Original Article

Robust Low Pass Filter-PID Controller for 2-DOF Helicopter System

Abstract

In this article, a robust control technique for 2-DOF helicopter system is presented. The 2-DOF helicopter system is 2 inputs and 2 outputs system that is suffering from the high nonlinearity and strong coupling. This paper focuses on design a simple, robust, and optimal controller for the helicopter system. Moreover, The proposed control method takes into account effects of the measurement noise in the closed loop system that effect on the performance of controller as well as the external disturbance. The proposed controller combines low pass filter with robust PID controller to ensure good tracking performance with high robustness. A low pass filter and PID controller are designed based H∞weighted mixed sensitivity. Nonlinear dynamic model of 2-DOF helicopter system linearized and then decoupled into pitch and yaw models. Finally, proposed controller applied for each model. Matlab program is used to check effectiveness the proposed control method. Simulation results show that the proposed controllers has best tracking performance with no overshot and the smallest settling time with respect to standard H∞and optimized PID controller.

References

  1. A. H. Mary, A. H. Miry, and M. H. Miry, “Design robust h infinity-pid controller for a helicopter system using sequential quadratic programming algorithm,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 688–696, 2022.
  2. K. J. Kadhim et al., “Simulation of longitudinal stability of helicopter in forward flight,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 357–376, 2013.
  3. E. V. Kumar, G. S. Raaja, and J. Jerome, “Adaptive pso for optimal lqr tracking control of 2 dof laboratory helicopter,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 41, pp. 77–90, 2016.
  4. R. G. Subramanian and V. K. Elumalai, “Robust mrac augmented baseline lqr for tracking control of 2 dof 42 | Mohammed & Mary helicopter,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 86, pp. 70–77, 2016.
  5. S. Karthick, S. Kanthalakshmi, E. Vinodh Kumar, V. Joshi Kumar, and A. Ezhil Kumaran, “Experimen- tal validation of adaptive augmented lqi control for a 2 dof helicopter,” IETE Journal of Research, pp. 1–13, 2022.
  6. O. Garcia-Castro, L. Ramos-Velasco, E. Escamilla- Hern´andez, R. Garcia-Rodriguez, M. Vega-Navarrete, C. Dom´ınguez-Mayorga, and L. Oliva-Moreno, “Neuro- adaptive pid helicopter controller based on atomic func- tions,” in The conference on Latin America Control Congress, pp. 239–250, Springer, 2020.
  7. A. H. Mary, A. H. Miry, and M. H. Miry, “System uncer- tainties estimation based adaptive robust backstepping control for dc dc buck converter.,” International Jour- nal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (2088-8708), vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.
  8. A. K. Hamoudi and N. O. A. Rahman, “Design an inte- gral sliding mode controller for a nonlinear system,” Al- Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 138– 147, 2017.
  9. T. Jiang, D. Lin, and T. Song, “Novel integral sliding mode control for small-scale unmanned helicopters,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 356, no. 5, pp. 2668–2689, 2019.
  10. F. Thomas, A. V. Thottungal, and M. S. Johnson, “Com- posite control of a hovering helicopter based on opti- mized sliding mode control,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 191, pp. 756–775, 2021.
  11. T. Kara and A. H. Mary, “Robust trajectory tracking control of robotic manipulators based on model-free pid- smc approach,” Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018.
  12. M. S. Ahmed, A. H. M. Mary, and H. H. Jasim, “Robust computed torque control for uncertain robotic manip- ulatorss,” Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 22–28, 2021.
  13. A. H. Mary, T. Kara, and A. H. Miry, “Inverse kine- matics solution for robotic manipulators based on fuzzy logic and pd control,” in 2016 Al-Sadeq International Conference on Multidisciplinary in IT and Communica- tion Science and Applications (AIC-MITCSA), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2016.
  14. M. M. Al-Isawi, A. J. Attiya, and J. O. ADOGHE, “Uav control based on dual lqr and fuzzy-pid controller,” Al- Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 43– 53, 2020.
  15. S. Naderi, M. J. Blondin, and B. Rezaie, “Optimizing an adaptive fuzzy logic controller of a 3-dof helicopter with a modified pso algorithm,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1895–1913, 2023.
  16. Y. Hu, Y. Yang, S. Li, and Y. Zhou, “Fuzzy controller de- sign of micro-unmanned helicopter relying on improved genetic optimization algorithm,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 98, p. 105685, 2020.
  17. F. Pakro and A. A. Nikkhah, “A fuzzy adaptive controller design for integrated guidance and control of a nonlinear model helicopter,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 701–716, 2023.
  18. H. Ma, M. Chen, G. Feng, and Q. Wu, “Disturbance- observer-based adaptive fuzzy tracking control for un- manned autonomous helicopter with flight boundary con- straints,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 184–198, 2022.
  19. Y. Luo, Y. Mao, W. Ren, Y. Huang, C. Deng, and X. Zhou, “Multiple fusion based on the ccd and mems accelerometer for the low-cost multi-loop optoelectronic system control,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 7, p. 2153, 2018.
  20. Y. Luo, W. Ren, Y. Huang, Q. He, Q. Wu, X. Zhou, and Y. Mao, “Feedforward control based on error and distur- bance observation for the ccd and fiber-optic gyroscope- based mobile optoelectronic tracking system,” Electron- ics, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 223, 2018.
  21. W. Boukadida, A. Benamor, H. Messaoud, and P. Siarry, “Multi-objective design of optimal higher order sliding mode control for robust tracking of 2-dof helicopter system based on metaheuristics,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 91, pp. 442–455, 2019. 43 | Mohammed & Mary
  22. T. Amieur, M. Sedraoui, and O. Amieur, “Design of robust fractional-order pid controller for dc motor us- ing the adjustable performance weights in the weighted- mixed sensitivity problem,” IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 108, 2018.
  23. H. Oloomi and B. Shafai, “Weight selection in mixed sensitivity robust control for improving the sinusoidal tracking performance,” in 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37475), vol. 1, pp. 300–305, IEEE, 2003.