Cover
Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025)

Published: September 19, 2025

Pages: 23-35

Review Article

Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots, A review

Dina Ayad 1 Alaa Al-Ibadi Maria Elena Giannaccini 2
1Department of Computer Engineering, University of Basrah, Basrah 61004, Iraq
2University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB243FX, Scotland
History
  • Received: July 22, 2023
  • Revised: November 2, 2023
  • Accepted: November 17, 2023
  • Available Online: October 18, 2024
DOI

https://doi.org/10.37917/ijeee.21.1.3

Abstract

Using a lower limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation (LLE) Lower limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robots (LER) are designed to assist patients with daily duties and help them regain their ability to walk. Even though a substantial portion of them is capable of doing both, they have not yet succeeded in conducting agile and intelligent joint movement between humans and machines, which is their ultimate goal. The typical LLE products, rapid prototyping, and cutting-edge techniques are covered in this review. Restoring a patient’s athletic prowess to its pr-accident level is the aim of rehabilitation treatment. The core of research on lower limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robots is the understanding of human gait. The performance of common prototypes might be used to match wearable robot shapes to human limbs. To imitate a normal stride, robot-assisted treatment needs to be able to control the movement of the robot at each joint and move the patient’s limb.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Shi, W. Zhang, W. Zhang, and X. Ding, “A review on lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition), vol. 32, Dec 2019.
  2. S. Viteckova, P. Kutilek, and M. Jirina, “Wearable lower limb robotics: A review,” Biocybernetics and Biomedi- cal Engineering, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 96–105, 2013.
  3. A. McDaid, K. Kora, S. Xie, J. Lutz, and M. Battley, “Human-inspired robotic exoskeleton (hurex) for lower limb rehabilitation,” in 2013 IEEE International Con- ference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 19–24, 2013.
  4. I. D´ıaz, J. J. Gil, and E. S´anchez, “Lower-limb robotic re- habilitation: Literature review and challenges,” Journal of Robotics, vol. 2011, pp. 1–11, 2011.
  5. A. Kapsalyamov, P. K. Jamwal, S. Hussain, and M. H. Ghayesh, “State of the art lower limb robotic ex- oskeletons for elderly assistance,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 95075–95086, 2019.
  6. W. Z. Li, G. Z. Cao, and A. b. Zhu, “Review on control strategies for lower limb rehabilitation exoskeletons,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 123040–123060, 2021.
  7. H. Yan and C. Yang, “Design and validation of a lower limb exoskeleton employing the recumbent cycling modality for post-stroke rehabilitation,” Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci, vol. 228, no. 18, pp. 3517–3525, 2014.
  8. G. Yu, J. Wang, W. Chen, and J. Zhang, “Eeg-based brain-controlled lower extremity exoskeleton rehabili- tation robot,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), pp. 763–767, 2017.
  9. R. Goergen, A. C. Valdiero, L. A. Rasia, M. Oberd¨orfer, J. P. de Souza, and R. S. Gonc¸alves, “Development of a pneumatic exoskeleton robot for lower limb rehabilita- tion,” in 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 187–192, 2019.
  10. J. F. Veneman, R. Kruidhof, E. E. G. Hekman, R. Ekke- lenkamp, E. H. F. van Asseldonk, and H. van der Kooij, “Design and evaluation of the lopes exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 379–386, 2007. 34 | Ayad, Al-Ibadi & Giannaccini
  11. E. Akdoˇgan and M. A. Adli, “The design and control of a therapeutic exercise robot for lower limb rehabilitation: Physiotherabot,” Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 509– 522, 2011.
  12. C. H. Wu, H. F. Mao, J. S. Hu, T. Y. Wang, Y. J. Tsai, and W. L. Hsu, “The effects of gait training using powered lower limb exoskeleton robot on individuals with com- plete spinal cord injury,” J Neuroeng Rehabil, vol. 15, no. 1, 2018.
  13. L. Wang, S. Wang, E. H. F. van Asseldonk, and H. van der Kooij, “Actively controlled lateral gait as- sistance in a lower limb exoskeleton,” in 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems, pp. 965–970, 2013.
  14. Q. Fang, T. Xu, T. Zheng, H. Cai, J. Zhao, and Y. Zhu, “A rehabilitation training interactive method for lower limb exoskeleton robot,” Math Probl Eng, vol. 2022, 2022.
  15. J. A. Galvez and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Robotics for gait training after spinal cord injury,” 2005.
  16. G. Colombo, A. Waldner, and S. Efan Hesse, “Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis,”
  17. G. Colombo, M. Wirz, and V. Dietz, “Driven gait ortho- sis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients.,”
  18. S. Freivogel, J. Mehrholz, T. Husak-Sotomayor, and D. Schmalohr, “Gait training with the newly developed ’lokohelp’-system is feasible for non-ambulatory pa- tients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. a feasi- bility study,” Brain Inj, vol. 22, no. 7-8, pp. 625–632, 2008.
  19. H. Kawamoto and Y. Sankai, “Power assist system hal-3 for gait disorder person,”
  20. Y. Ma et al., “Online gait planning of lower-limb ex- oskeleton robot for paraplegic rehabilitation considering weight transfer process,” IEEE Transactions on Automa- tion Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 414– 425, 2021.
  21. D. X. Liu, X. Wu, W. Du, C. Wang, and T. Xu, “Gait phase recognition for lower-limb exoskeleton with only joint angular sensors,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 10, 2016.
  22. C. Vaida et al., “Systematic design of a parallel robotic system for lower limb rehabilitation,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 34522–34537, 2020.
  23. D. Tarnita, I. Geonea, A. Petcu, and D. N. Tarnita, “Nu- merical simulations and experimental human gait analy- sis using wearable sensors,” in Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol. 48, pp. 289–304, 2018.
  24. G. Huang et al., “Master-slave control of an intention- actuated exoskeletal robot for locomotion and lower extremity rehabilitation,” International Journal of Preci- sion Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 19, pp. 983– 991, Jul 2018.
  25. R. Goergen et al., “Development of a pneumatic ex- oskeleton robot for lower limb rehabilitation,” in 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), IEEE, 2019.
  26. S. K. Banala, S. K. Agrawal, A. Fattah, K. Rudolph, and J. P. Scholz, “A gravity balancing leg orthosis for robotic rehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 410–420, 2007.
  27. S. K. Agrawal et al., “Assessment of motion of a swing leg and gait rehabilitation with a gravity balancing ex- oskeleton,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 410–420, 2007.
  28. S. Mao et al., “Design and development of starfish-like robot: Soft bionic platform with multi-motion using sma actuators,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), IEEE, 2013.
  29. C. Jayawardena et al., “Deployment of a service robot to help older people,” in 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, 2010.
  30. F. Sposaro, J. Danielson, and G. Tyson, “iwander: An android application for dementia patients,” in 2010 An- nual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, IEEE, 2010.
  31. S. Jezernik, G. Colombo, T. Keller, H. Frueh, and M. Morari, “Robotic orthosis lokomat: A rehabilitation and research tool,” 2003.
  32. T. Hayashi, H. Kawamoto, and Y. Sankai, “Control method of robot suit hal working as operator’s muscle using biological and dynamical information,” 2005.
  33. J. M. Schiffman, K. N. Gregorczyk, C. K. Bensel, L. Has- selquist, and J. P. Obusek, “Effects of a lower-body ex- oskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechan- ics during load carriage,” Ergonomics, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1263–1275, 2010. 35 | Ayad, Al-Ibadi & Giannaccini
  34. J. M. Schiffman et al., “The effects of a lower body exoskeleton load carriage assistive device on limits of stability and postural sway,” Ergonomics, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1515–1529, 2008.
  35. A. J. Young and D. P. Ferris, “State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation En- gineering, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2017.
  36. R. J. Farris, H. A. Quintero, and M. Goldfarb, “Prelim- inary evaluation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals,” IEEE Transac- tions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 652–659, 2011.
  37. H. A. Quintero, R. J. Farris, and M. Goldfarb, “A method for the autonomous control of lower limb exoskeletons for persons with paraplegia,” Journal of Medical Devices, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 6, no. 4, 2012.
  38. C. M. Thalman, T. Hertzell, and H. Lee, “Toward a soft robotic ankle-foot orthosis (sr-afo) exosuit for human lo- comotion: Preliminary results in late stance plantarflex- ion assistance,” tech. rep., 2020.
  39. H. Al-Mosawi, A. Al-Ibadi, and T. Abdalla, “A com- prehensive comparison of different control strategies to adjust the length of the soft contractor pneumatic muscle actuator,” Iraqi Journal for Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2022.
  40. S. H. Collins, M. B. Wiggin, and G. S. Sawicki, “Reduc- ing the energy cost of human walking using an unpow- ered exoskeleton,” Nature, vol. 522, no. 7555, pp. 212– 215, 2015.
  41. X. Yang et al., “State of the art: Bipedal robots for lower limb rehabilitation,” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 11, p. 1182, 2017.